mhn-core-docker vs Shockpot-Frontend: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
mhn-core-docker is a free honeypots & deception tool. Shockpot-Frontend is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal threat intelligence labs or validating detection rules will find real value in mhn-core-docker because it collapses the friction of spinning up a multi-honeypot network; the Docker containerization cuts deployment time from hours to minutes, and the geolocation-enriched event stream gives you immediately actionable attack patterns. The 35 GitHub stars and active cowrie/dionaea integration suggest steady maintenance for a free tool. Skip this if you need managed honeypot infrastructure with SLA guarantees or commercial support; mhn-core-docker requires hands-on ops work and assumes comfort debugging containerized environments.
Security teams running Shockpot honeypots who need to surface attack patterns across their deployment will find value in Shockpot-Frontend's ability to visualize and chart honeypot events without building custom dashboards. The tool is free and connects directly to PostgreSQL, removing vendor lock-in and licensing friction for organizations already invested in the Shockpot honeypot project. Skip this if you're looking for alert orchestration, response workflows, or integration with your SIEM; Shockpot-Frontend is visualization only, and the four GitHub stars suggest limited adoption and maintenance activity.
