pybof vs SharpShooter: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
pybof is a free offensive security tool. SharpShooter is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to execute custom BOFs without touching disk will find PyBOF essential for post-exploitation work; it's the only Python-native option for in-memory Beacon Object File execution, letting you skip Cobalt Strike's GUI entirely and automate payloads programmatically. The 80 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal real adoption among operators, not just theoretical interest. Skip this if you're looking for evasion magic; PyBOF assumes you've already got execution and focuses narrowly on loading and running BOFs, which means your success depends entirely on the quality of the BOF itself and your network position.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to generate obfuscated C# payloads without maintaining multiple tools will find SharpShooter's unified payload framework cuts weeks off engagement prep. The 1,976 GitHub stars and active community contributions signal this is the go-to for operators who want anti-evasion baked into payload creation rather than bolted on after. Skip this if your team relies on multi-stage Beacon redirectors or needs polymorphic shellcode generation; SharpShooter excels at C# execution chains but doesn't replace your full post-exploitation stack.
