SharpAppLocker vs Fridump: 2026 Comparison
SharpAppLocker is a free offensive security tool. Fridump is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers auditing Windows application control policies will find SharpAppLocker essential for reconnaissance; it directly mirrors the native Get-AppLockerPolicy functionality without requiring interactive PowerShell, reducing detection risk during engagements. The tool's C# implementation and 100 GitHub stars reflect adoption among practitioners who need to enumerate AppLocker rules before testing bypass techniques. Skip this if you're looking for a policy enforcement or management tool; SharpAppLocker is a read-only enumeration instrument, not a configuration platform.
Mobile application security testers and red teamers need Fridump because it hooks into running processes via Frida to extract memory at runtime without requiring root or junk reverse engineering workflows. The 838 GitHub stars reflect active adoption among practitioners who regularly test iOS and Android apps, and the zero licensing cost means you can deploy it across your entire assessment team without procurement friction. Skip this if you need a polished GUI or vendor support; Fridump is command-line only and maintained by the community, so you're troubleshooting your own memory dumps.
