Safe Security Autonomous CTEM vs Sequretek Percept CTEM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Safe Security Autonomous CTEM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in exposure data across 100+ tools will see immediate value in Safe Security Autonomous CTEM because its AI agents actually close the loop between discovery and remediation instead of just surfacing more alerts. The platform maps to seven NIST CSF 2.0 functions including the often-neglected GV.SC supply chain risk layer, and its cyber risk quantification gives your board a language beyond "critical vulnerabilities." Skip this if your team lacks the operational maturity to act on automated remediation recommendations; Safe's strength in risk orchestration compounds the problem if you can't field the response.

Sequretek Percept CTEM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in asset sprawl across hybrid infrastructure will find value in Percept CTEM's AI-driven risk ranking, which cuts through noise by surfacing what actually matters for your threat model instead of flooding you with every CVE match. The platform covers asset discovery, continuous monitoring, and remediation integration with XDR and SIEM tools, hitting four key NIST CSF 2.0 functions including the often-neglected Asset Management and Risk Assessment areas. Skip this if your team needs deep forensic capabilities or incident response automation; Percept is built for exposure visibility and prioritization, not post-breach investigation.