Armis Centrix™ for VIPR Pro vs Safe Security Autonomous CTEM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armis Centrix™ for VIPR Pro

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in vulnerability alerts from disparate scanners will see the fastest ROI from Armis Centrix™ for VIPR Pro because it actually collapses finding duplication and groups fixes by root cause instead of just ranking risk scores. The AI-driven consolidation cuts alert volume hard while the end-to-end remediation workflows with ownership assignment force accountability downstream, a gap most exposure management tools leave unfilled. Skip this if your team wants a lightweight cloud-only scanner or needs forensic-grade incident analysis; Centrix™ is built for organizations that have detection figured out but remediation workflows that leak.

Safe Security Autonomous CTEM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in exposure data across 100+ tools will see immediate value in Safe Security Autonomous CTEM because its AI agents actually close the loop between discovery and remediation instead of just surfacing more alerts. The platform maps to seven NIST CSF 2.0 functions including the often-neglected GV.SC supply chain risk layer, and its cyber risk quantification gives your board a language beyond "critical vulnerabilities." Skip this if your team lacks the operational maturity to act on automated remediation recommendations; Safe's strength in risk orchestration compounds the problem if you can't field the response.