Fortra ZTNA vs Seqrite ZTNA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Fortra ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Fortra. Seqrite ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Seqrite. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN will find Fortra ZTNA's strongest value in its hybrid deployment flexibility and granular access controls that actually enforce least-privilege without admin headaches. The platform covers all four critical NIST CSF 2.0 areas for identity and continuous monitoring, which matters because most ZTNA products punt on asset inventory or detection tuning. Skip this if your org needs deep integration with legacy on-premises identity systems or runs exclusively on-prem; Fortra's strength is in hybrid environments where cloud and datacenter access requirements overlap.
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPNs with application-layer access control will find Seqrite ZTNA's device posture binding and tag-based policies do the job without requiring agents on every endpoint. The built-in WAF and Layer-7 filtering handle application protection that competitors push to separate modules, reducing toolchain bloat. Skip this if your organization needs deep identity recovery capabilities or runs primarily on-premises; Seqrite's NIST coverage prioritizes access control and continuous monitoring over resilience engineering.
