CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Segura PAM Core: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Enterprise security teams managing privileged access across on-premise, cloud, and operational technology environments should choose CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for its zero standing privileges architecture, which eliminates the attack surface that static credential vaults leave exposed. The platform's just-in-time access model combined with tamper-proof Digital Vault storage and 99.95% SLA availability reflects design choices built for organizations where privilege misuse creates material risk. This is not the tool for smaller teams seeking a lightweight alternative to full-featured PAM; CyberArk's strength lies in complexity and scale, not simplicity.

Segura PAM Core

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling privileged accounts across hybrid infrastructure will find Segura PAM Core's strength in session monitoring and recording, which catches what credential vaults alone miss. The platform's NIST coverage in continuous monitoring and incident analysis means you get forensic-ready logs when breach investigations start, not scrambling to reconstruct who did what. Skip this if you need integrated identity governance or automated access certification workflows; Segura focuses the tool on access control and auditability rather than the full identity lifecycle.