Sec1 ConTek vs Trend Micro Container Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Sec1 ConTek

Development teams shipping Docker images through multi-cloud registries need Sec1 ConTek for its layer-by-layer scanning that catches vulnerabilities in OS packages and third-party libraries before they reach production. The tool addresses ID.RA and PR.PS under NIST CSF 2.0, meaning it surfaces risk accurately and integrates directly into CI/CD pipelines where it actually stops bad deployments, not just reports them after the fact. Skip this if you're standardized on a single registry or need runtime container threat detection; ConTek is built for the scanning phase, not what happens when containers are already running.

Trend Micro Container Security

Teams running Kubernetes in regulated industries should pick Trend Micro Container Security for its policy-based admission control paired with runtime drift detection, which catches both misconfiguration and active compromise in the same workflow. The platform covers NIST ID.RA through DE.AE, meaning it handles risk assessment and continuous monitoring without leaving gaps between what's approved at deploy time and what actually runs. Skip this if you need deep integration with existing SIEM tooling or if your team lacks Kubernetes expertise; the admission control policy syntax rewards operators who already think in Kubernetes primitives.