scrying vs gowitness: 2026 Comparison
scrying is a free offensive security tool. gowitness is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers validating RDP and web application access controls need scrying for its speed in capturing live session activity without requiring agent installation. The tool's free pricing and 474 GitHub stars reflect active adoption among offensive security practitioners who value lightweight automation over commercial EDR-style monitoring. Skip this if you're looking for persistent logging infrastructure or compliance-ready audit trails; scrying is a tactical engagement tool, not a detection platform.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need fast, scalable screenshot reconnaissance will find gowitness invaluable; it batches headless Chrome captures across hundreds of targets in minutes, cutting reconnaissance time to a fraction of manual efforts. The 3,909 GitHub stars and active Go codebase mean you're working with a tool trusted across actual engagements, not theoretical POCs. Skip this if your team needs visual comparison across time or advanced OCR for text extraction; gowitness captures and catalogs, but leaves analysis and correlation to you.
