ScareCrow vs Covenant: 2026 Comparison
ScareCrow is a free offensive security tool. Covenant is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers validating EDR evasion will find ScareCrow's payload obfuscation most valuable; it generates working shells that bypass common behavioral detection heuristics through legitimate Windows API chains rather than raw shellcode injection. The 2,879 GitHub stars and active community contributions signal the framework actually works against current EDR signatures in live testing. Skip this if your goal is understanding why an EDR failed you after the fact; ScareCrow is offense-first and won't help you build detection logic or tune your own stack.
Red teamers and security engineers running internal assessments will find Covenant's .NET-native C2 architecture invaluable for simulating attacks that bypass standard logging and detection; the 4,641 GitHub stars reflect active community maintenance and real-world deployment at scale. Its collaborative operator interface and task-based workflow beat Metasploit for team-based engagements, especially when you need parallel execution across multiple targets. Not for buyers seeking a fully managed platform or cross-platform flexibility; Covenant's .NET focus and steeper learning curve make it a specialist tool, not a replacement for commercial red team frameworks.
