GridPot vs SCADA HoneyNet Project: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
GridPot is a free honeypots & deception tool. SCADA HoneyNet Project is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Power grid operators and critical infrastructure teams testing ICS attack scenarios need GridPot because it simulates realistic grid environments without requiring expensive hardware; the framework's integration of GridLAB-D for power system dynamics with Conpot's industrial protocol emulation means you can detect attacks against SCADA systems that generic honeypots miss. The 61 GitHub stars and free pricing make this accessible for proof-of-concept work, but GridPot is built for detection-heavy operations; it won't help teams focused on forensics or incident response workflows after an attack surfaces.
Critical infrastructure security teams with limited budgets who need to test detection logic against realistic SCADA traffic will find SCADA HoneyNet Project valuable because it simulates actual industrial control architectures (DCS, PLC) rather than generic network services. Built on Honeyd, it requires hands-on configuration and Linux expertise to deploy, so you're building your own lab environment, not buying a managed platform. Skip this if your team lacks the engineering capacity to maintain custom honeypot infrastructure or needs commercial support and threat intelligence feeds integrated into your monitoring stack.
