Saruman v0.1 vs WebDAV Covert Channel: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Saruman v0.1 is a free offensive security tool. WebDAV Covert Channel is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers validating EDR evasion techniques will find Saruman v0.1 useful for its dual injection approach; the stealth variants let you test whether your target's memory inspection actually catches parasitic code, not just whether it blocks obvious syscalls. The 138 GitHub stars and proof-of-concept maturity suggest active use in adversary simulation workflows. Skip this if you need production-grade injection stability or vendor support; Saruman is a research tool for understanding injection mechanics, not a foundation for persistent access frameworks.
Red team operators and penetration testers validating WebDAV weaknesses in their own infrastructure will find WebDAV Covert Channel valuable for demonstrating C2 evasion tactics that slip past signature-based detection. The tool's use of native WebDAV protocol features means it generates legitimate-looking traffic patterns that most organizations haven't specifically instrumented to catch, making it effective for stress-testing detection gaps in NIST Detect capabilities. Skip this if your goal is operational C2 for live engagements; it's a lab tool for controlled assessment, not a field weapon, and requires explicit network access to WebDAV services most enterprises have already disabled.
