Sadcloud vs Simulator: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Sadcloud is a free cyber range training tool. Simulator is a free cyber range training tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building hands-on incident response muscle for AWS will get the most from Sadcloud because it embeds 84 real vulnerabilities across 22 services into a free, reproducible lab environment rather than asking engineers to memorize threat scenarios. The Terraform-based infrastructure means your team practices detection and remediation against actual misconfigured resources they'll encounter in production, not sanitized simulations. Skip this if your organization needs compliance-focused training or remediation guidance; Sadcloud assumes you already know what "secure" looks like and just need the reps to find it under pressure.
Security teams building internal red team capacity or running incident response drills will get the most from Simulator because it lets you spin up deliberately broken Kubernetes clusters in AWS without needing to maintain custom vulnerable infrastructure. The free pricing and 981 GitHub stars indicate active adoption among practitioners who value hands-on cluster attack scenarios over theoretical exercises. Skip this if your team needs a polished SaaS training platform with guided curricula and progress tracking; Simulator is a raw sandbox, not a structured learning program.
