AI EdgeLabs Compliance Center vs Root Compliance Proofwork: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AI EdgeLabs Compliance Center

Mid-market and enterprise teams under NIS2 and CRA compliance pressure need AI EdgeLabs Compliance Center for its asset-centric risk scoring that actually prioritizes what matters: vulnerabilities weighted by exploitability and asset criticality rather than raw CVE counts. Real-time framework mapping with percentage coverage tracking means you know exactly which compliance gaps remain, and the firmware SBOM verification catches supply chain risks in edge devices that most tools ignore. Skip this if your primary need is continuous monitoring of deployed threats in production; the tool excels at pre-deployment risk assessment and compliance posture, not incident response or threat hunting.

Root Compliance Proofwork

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in manual compliance evidence collection will find genuine relief in Root Compliance Proofwork because it generates cryptographically signed artifacts on demand rather than forcing your engineers to hunt down screenshots and logs. The tool covers FedRAMP, CMMC 2.0, SOC 2, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001 with one-click exports, plus continuous monitoring against CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list, which actually moves the needle on audit cycle time. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on-premises infrastructure or needs the supply chain risk mapping that other vendors bake in; Proofwork optimizes for evidence generation over upstream SBOM analysis.