Lunar vs RiskProfiler - Cyber Threat Intelligence: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Lunar

Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.

RiskProfiler - Cyber Threat Intelligence

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing external-facing infrastructure will get the most from RiskProfiler - Cyber Threat Intelligence because it maps indicators of compromise directly to attacker behavior using MITRE ATT&CK, cutting through alert noise with contextual validation instead of raw IoC volume. Real-time detection and enrichment across WHOIS, TLS, DNS, and paste data sources keeps your detection layer sharp, which aligns with NIST DE.CM priorities. Not the right fit if your team needs threat intelligence as a secondary feature bolted onto a SIEM or needs deep incident response automation; RiskProfiler assumes you have dedicated threat intel workflows.