RedWarden vs WebDAV Covert Channel: 2026 Comparison
RedWarden is a free offensive security tool. WebDAV Covert Channel is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and adversary simulation teams need RedWarden to slip Cobalt Strike traffic past detection without rebuilding infrastructure for every engagement; its packet inspection and malleable profile correlation do what most proxies can't, which is actually correlate your profiles to your C2 behavior instead of just forwarding bytes. The 991 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect real adoption in mature red team shops running repeatable assessments. Skip this if your team runs exclusively off-the-shelf frameworks without customizing profiles or if you lack the operator experience to debug why a particular defensive sensor still catches your callbacks; this is a precision tool that rewards knowledge of your target's defenses.
Red team operators and penetration testers validating WebDAV weaknesses in their own infrastructure will find WebDAV Covert Channel valuable for demonstrating C2 evasion tactics that slip past signature-based detection. The tool's use of native WebDAV protocol features means it generates legitimate-looking traffic patterns that most organizations haven't specifically instrumented to catch, making it effective for stress-testing detection gaps in NIST Detect capabilities. Skip this if your goal is operational C2 for live engagements; it's a lab tool for controlled assessment, not a field weapon, and requires explicit network access to WebDAV services most enterprises have already disabled.
