Redirect.rules vs FourCore ATTACK: 2026 Comparison
Redirect.rules is a free offensive security tool. FourCore ATTACK is a commercial offensive security tool by FourCore. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to quickly spin up convincing redirect chains during assessments should reach for Redirect.rules; it cuts the manual configuration work that typically burns hours on social engineering engagements. The tool is free and maintains active GitHub community support at 170 stars, meaning you're not betting on abandoned code. Skip this if you're looking for post-exploitation payload delivery or network-layer redirection; Redirect.rules is built for HTTP redirect scenarios only, and its simplicity is intentional.
Mid-market and enterprise teams that need to prove their defenses actually work against real adversary tactics will get the most from FourCore ATTACK. Its adversary emulation engine forces you to test detection and response workflows with evidence of what failed, moving beyond checkbox compliance toward ID.RA risk assessment that sticks with your board. Skip this if your team lacks the security maturity to act on emulation findings; the tool surfaces gaps faster than your people can typically close them.
