PacketViper OT360/OTRemote/IT360/Deception360 vs RazorSecure: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

PacketViper OT360/OTRemote/IT360/Deception360

Enterprise and mid-market operations teams with legacy OT environments will value PacketViper OT360/OTRemote/IT360/Deception360 primarily for agentless detection that doesn't require patching or retrofitting unmanaged industrial devices. The deception layer (Deception360) catches internal threats that traditional network monitoring misses, and wire-speed prevention means you're blocking attacks in transit rather than just logging them post-incident. This tool prioritizes detection and containment over incident response workflows, so it's not the right fit if you need tight SOAR integration or extensive playbook automation; you're buying a purpose-built OT security perimeter, not an orchestration platform.

RazorSecure

Mid-market and enterprise rail operators protecting rolling stock and wayside infrastructure should evaluate RazorSecure for its EN50155 Level 7 firewall and anomaly-based detection purpose-built for rail OT networks, where commercial firewalls create false positives and break mission-critical signaling. The tool maps directly to NIST DE.CM continuous monitoring and PR.PS platform security, addressing the detection and infrastructure resilience gaps most rail operators struggle with after inheriting legacy wayside systems. Skip this if your priority is recovery automation or broad IT-OT convergence; RazorSecure is narrowly focused on preventing intrusion and maintaining visibility, not orchestrating incident response.