Pupy vs NimPlant: 2026 Comparison
Pupy is a free offensive security tool. NimPlant is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running structured assessments need Pupy for its genuine cross-platform reach and minimal operational footprint; the 8,948 GitHub stars reflect active community maintenance that keeps payloads functional across Windows, Linux, macOS, and Android without the licensing friction of commercial C2 frameworks. The tool's strength is flexibility and cost, not operational security or defensive evasion,modern EDR will catch it unless you're actively managing MITRE ATT&CK tradecraft. This is not for teams that need polished UI, enterprise support, or built-in OPSEC features; it's for practitioners who know how C2 infrastructure works and want to customize every layer themselves.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need a lightweight C2 that won't bloat their infrastructure or trigger behavioral detection should reach for NimPlant. The Nim language compiles to small, efficient binaries that blend into normal process execution better than heavier C2 frameworks, and its 936 GitHub stars indicate active maintenance within the red team community. Skip this if your operation requires built-in evasion modules or post-exploitation libraries; NimPlant is intentionally minimal and expects operators to chain it with other tools rather than self-contained.
