Pulsedive vs Lunar: 2026 Comparison
Pulsedive is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Teams under 50 people running lean threat intel operations should start with Pulsedive; the free tier removes the budget excuse for enriching indicators before they hit your detection tools. You get API-first architecture that plays well with SIEM ingestion and a research interface that doesn't require threat intel certifications to use. Skip this if you need managed hunting, custom feeds, or integration with premium commercial intelligence; Pulsedive trades analyst-driven curation for self-service speed.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
