InterVision DRaaS vs ProLion ClusterLion: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

InterVision DRaaS

Mid-market and enterprise teams that need guaranteed recovery windows rather than best-effort estimates should evaluate InterVision DRaaS; the mutually agreed-upon RTO SLAs with minute-level incident response directly address the gap between theoretical RTOs and actual business outcomes. The 99.99% infrastructure availability SLA during replication and the certified recovery testing with 100% success guarantee mean you're not betting on untested failover procedures when an incident hits. Skip this if your organization needs a self-service platform without dedicated support, or if you're a small company where the managed service overhead outweighs the recovery certainty it provides.

ProLion ClusterLion

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams managing critical data across Dell or NetApp storage will value ClusterLion for eliminating the complexity of traditional clustering without sacrificing automated failover; the platform removes shared storage requirements entirely, which cuts both infrastructure cost and failure points that plague conventional HA setups. On-premises deployment and support for PowerScale, MetroCluster, and PowerStore environments means you're not rearchitecting your existing storage layer. Skip this if your priority is detection and forensics rather than pure uptime; ClusterLion's NIST coverage tilts heavily toward recovery execution, not incident detection.