Microsoft Entra ID vs Pointsharp MFA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Microsoft Entra ID

Enterprise and mid-market teams already committed to Microsoft 365 should choose Microsoft Entra ID because it eliminates the identity tax of managing a separate platform, with conditional access policies that actually enforce what your Microsoft-native apps require. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage on PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control) is solid, and the integration with Security Copilot means threat investigation workflows stay within your existing Microsoft ecosystem rather than forcing context-switching. Skip this if you need deep API governance or fine-grained entitlements for non-Microsoft SaaS applications; Entra ID treats those as secondary use cases, and you'll end up stitching in third-party tools anyway.

Pointsharp MFA

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid infrastructure with Active Directory, cloud identity, and stringent token lifecycle requirements should prioritize Pointsharp MFA for its native support across AD, AD FS, Entra ID, and SAP without forcing rip-and-replace decisions. The platform's FIDO2 compliance and built-in YubiKey and certificate lifecycle management eliminate the operational friction of bolting on separate hardware token programs. Skip this if your organization standardizes on a single cloud identity provider and doesn't need on-premises deployment flexibility; you'll overpay for capabilities you won't use.