Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC is a commercial vulnerability assessment tool by Greenbone AG. PlumHound is a free vulnerability assessment tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best vulnerability assessment fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Small and mid-market security teams with limited budgets will find real value in Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC because it covers the major vendor stacks (Oracle, Microsoft, Cisco, VMware, Palo Alto) without forcing you into expensive multi-year contracts. The on-premises deployment model means no recurring SaaS fees, and LDAP/Radius integration handles authentication without extra tooling. Skip this if you need continuous monitoring with automated response; OPENVAS BASIC prioritizes the scan-and-report workflow over real-time anomaly detection, leaving the response half of your risk cycle understaffed.
Red teamers and penetration testers evaluating Active Directory attack paths will find PlumHound essential because it translates BloodHoundAD's graph queries into written reports that actually get board attention, not just JSON exports. The tool is free and maintained across 1,281 GitHub stars, removing cost as a barrier to adoption in lean security teams. Skip this if your org needs continuous monitoring of live AD changes rather than point-in-time assessment; PlumHound excels at one-off engagements and remediation tracking, not real-time threat hunting.
Entry-level vulnerability management solution for small and medium businesses
PlumHound is a reporting engine that converts BloodHoundAD's Neo4J queries into operational security reports for analyzing Active Directory vulnerabilities and attack paths.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC vs PlumHound for your vulnerability assessment needs.
Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC: Entry-level vulnerability management solution for small and medium businesses. built by Greenbone AG. Core capabilities include Vulnerability scanning for consumer and enterprise software, Automated scan initialization, Vulnerability reporting..
PlumHound: PlumHound is a reporting engine that converts BloodHoundAD's Neo4J queries into operational security reports for analyzing Active Directory vulnerabilities and attack paths..
Both serve the Vulnerability Assessment market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC is developed by Greenbone AG. PlumHound is open-source with 1,281 GitHub stars. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC and PlumHound serve similar Vulnerability Assessment use cases: both are Vulnerability Assessment tools, both cover Active Directory. Key differences: Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC is Commercial while PlumHound is Free, PlumHound is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox