Check Point Threat Intelligence vs Peraton ThreatBoard: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Check Point Threat Intelligence

Mid-market and enterprise security teams who need actionable threat actor intelligence tied to their industry and region will find Check Point Threat Intelligence cuts through noise faster than generic feeds. The platform covers NIST DE.AE and DE.CM strongly through daily IOC feeds, dark web monitoring, and MITRE ATT&CK-mapped malware cards, meaning your analysts spend less time normalizing data and more time hunting. Skip this if your priority is risk quantification or if you lack the staffing to operationalize custom threat research; the tool excels at feeding detection and investigation, not at automating response or risk scoring.

Peraton ThreatBoard

Enterprise and mid-market threat intel teams should pick Peraton ThreatBoard if your analysts are drowning in disconnected feeds and your CTI pipeline can't keep pace with ingestion volume. The AI-driven correlation and automated tagging of multi-source threat data cuts the manual validation work that typically bogs down teams, and the modular architecture means you're not forced into rigid vendor lock-in when you add new intelligence sources. Fair warning: this tool prioritizes detection and continuous monitoring over the investigation and response phases, so it's not the right fit if you need deep forensics or playbook automation alongside your threat intelligence.