ACI Learning Skill Labs vs Peraton Advanced Cyber Solutions: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ACI Learning Skill Labs

Academic programs and corporate training teams need ACI Learning Skill Labs because it actually lets students break things hands-on instead of watching videos, which is the only way network and security fundamentals stick. The CollegePro sets align with real course calendars across years 1-2, and auto-grading cuts instructor overhead on repetitive validation work. This is built for schools and training departments, not for security operations teams looking to upskill existing staff on incident response or threat hunting; if your goal is certifications and foundational competency, this works; if you need role-specific depth for security engineers already in the field, look elsewhere.

Peraton Advanced Cyber Solutions

Enterprise and mid-market security teams responsible for critical infrastructure or high-stakes operational technology environments should evaluate Peraton Advanced Cyber Solutions for its cyber range training and network defense integration; the vendor's 13,000-person scale and US government contracting background mean the platform is built for adversarial realism at scale, not simplified tabletop exercises. Coverage across NIST PR.AT, PR.PS, and PR.IR reflects a training-first architecture that emphasizes personnel readiness and resilience planning over detection tools. This is not the right choice if your priority is continuous monitoring or incident response automation; Peraton prioritizes building defensive muscle memory rather than operating detection infrastructure.