Papa Shango vs Ivy: 2026 Comparison
Papa Shango is a free offensive security tool. Ivy is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running controlled engagements on Linux targets need Papa Shango for shellcode injection that bypasses NULL byte filtering; ptrace-based process injection remains one of the few reliable ways to test process memory defenses without rebuilding binaries. The tool is free and requires no special kernel modules or elevated compilation steps beyond standard GCC. Skip this if you're looking for cross-platform payload delivery or automated exploit chains; Papa Shango does one thing,inject assembly into live processes,and does it without the baggage.
Red teamers and penetration testers running Windows-focused assessments will find Ivy valuable for its direct approach to VBA-based code execution; it bypasses common detection patterns by executing shellcode in-memory without touching disk. With 744 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's proven enough for lab work and controlled engagements. Skip this if your team needs post-exploitation frameworks with built-in persistence or lateral movement capabilities; Ivy is payload delivery, not command and control.
