Commix-Testbed vs OWASP Bricks: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Commix-Testbed is a free cyber range training tool. OWASP Bricks is a free cyber range training tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building detection rules for command injection vulnerabilities should use Commix-Testbed to validate their signatures against real exploitation patterns; the 182 GitHub stars reflect active use by practitioners who stress-test detection tools rather than rely on vendor claims. The free pricing means you can spin up vulnerable apps without budget friction, then immediately measure whether your IDS, WAF, or SIEM actually catches the payloads you care about. Skip this if your team has no command injection risk in scope or lacks the engineering bandwidth to run a local testbed; it requires hands-on configuration, not point-and-click deployment.
Security teams and individual practitioners who need to build muscle memory on real web attack vectors should start with OWASP Bricks; it's free, requires zero infrastructure setup, and lets you exploit actual vulnerability classes without the legal and ethical friction of lab environments. The tool includes deliberately flawed code across OWASP Top 10 categories, so you're practicing against problems that match what you'll find in production assessments. Skip this if your team needs guided paths or compliance-aligned reporting; Bricks is a sandbox for hands-on breaking, not a training platform with curriculum or audit trails.
