Osquery vs Doorman: 2026 Comparison
Osquery is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Doorman is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams managing macOS fleets at scale should pick Osquery for endpoint visibility that doesn't require expensive commercial EDR licensing; it ships queryable system activity data from thousands of hosts without agent bloat. The tool has been deployed by Meta, Apple, and Uber across hundreds of thousands of endpoints, proving it handles volume. Osquery excels at hunt-driven investigation and compliance baselines but doesn't include behavioral detection or automated response, so teams expecting out-of-the-box threat hunting will need to layer in separate analytics.
Security teams managing osquery at scale will find Doorman's lightweight approach to fleet management valuable when your infrastructure is already built on osquery and you need remote configuration control without the overhead of a commercial EDR platform. The free pricing and 620 GitHub stars reflect active use in lean security shops running osquery across hundreds of nodes. Skip this if you need behavioral threat detection or response automation; Doorman is query management only, not endpoint detection, so it pairs with osquery's detection capabilities rather than replacing them.
