Cohesity FortKnox vs OpenText Data Backup and Recovery: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cohesity FortKnox

Mid-market and enterprise teams facing ransomware threats need FortKnox because its air-gapped virtual vault makes encrypted backups genuinely unreachable during active attacks, not just theoretically so. The immutable snapshots with retention locks address NIST PR.DS and RC.RP functions that most backup tools treat as afterthoughts, while integrated threat scanning before restore prevents you from recovering compromised data. Skip this if your organization can tolerate a longer recovery window; the isolation model trades some restore speed for the certainty that your backup tier stays isolated even when production infrastructure is already encrypted.

OpenText Data Backup and Recovery

Mid-market and enterprise ops teams managing hybrid infrastructure across 200+ applications will get the most from OpenText Data Backup and Recovery because it handles physical, virtual, and legacy systems from a single console without forcing rip-and-replace decisions. Support for over 200 operating systems, platforms, and applications means you're not managing separate tools for your mainframe, VMware, and SaaS; ransomware recovery built into the platform addresses RC.RP incident recovery execution directly. Skip this if your organization runs exclusively cloud-native workloads and wants to avoid the overhead of managing on-premises backup appliances; the hybrid architecture is a strength for legacy shops, a liability for greenfield deployments.