What is the difference between OneSpan Product vs Guardsquare DexGuard?

**OneSpan Product**: Mobile app security solution protecting against reverse engineering & attacks. built by OneSpan. headquartered in United States.. **Guardsquare DexGuard**: Android app protection tool with obfuscation, encryption, and RASP. built by Guardsquare. headquartered in Belgium. Core capabilities include Name obfuscation, Control flow obfuscation, Code virtualization.. Both serve the Mobile App Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Who makes OneSpan Product vs Guardsquare DexGuard?

**OneSpan Product** is developed by OneSpan. **Guardsquare DexGuard** is developed by Guardsquare. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is OneSpan Product a good alternative to Guardsquare DexGuard?

OneSpan Product and Guardsquare DexGuard serve similar Mobile App Security use cases: both are Mobile App Security tools, both cover Android Security, Reverse Engineering, App Security. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

OneSpan Product vs Guardsquare DexGuard (2026) | Compare Mobile App Security Tools

OneSpan Product vs Guardsquare DexGuard: 2026 Comparison

OneSpan Product is a commercial mobile app security tool by OneSpan. Guardsquare DexGuard is a commercial mobile app security tool by Guardsquare. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best mobile app security fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:

Guardsquare DexGuard

Mobile security teams shipping Android apps to consumers will get real value from DexGuard's polymorphic builds and runtime self-protection, which force attackers to reverse-engineer a unique binary each time rather than reusing exploits across your user base. The tamper detection, debugger blocking, and emulator checks address the NIST Platform Security control directly by making the app itself resistant to tampering. Skip this if you're building internal enterprise apps for employees; the overhead and complexity aren't worth it when you control the device environment.

Data verified Apr 2026