OneGadget vs PEDA: 2026 Comparison
OneGadget is a free penetration testing tool. PEDA is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and security researchers doing manual exploit development on Linux will find PEDA indispensable for speeding up low-level binary analysis; the 6,111 GitHub stars reflect years of active use in red teams who've standardized on GDB workflows. The tool's colorized output and exploit-specific commands cut analysis time significantly compared to raw GDB, particularly for stack overflow and format string research. Skip PEDA if your team relies primarily on Windows binaries or needs a graphical debugger; it's a command-line power tool for practitioners who already speak GDB fluently.
OneGadget
OneGadget is a CTF-focused tool that uses symbolic execution to find RCE gadgets in binaries that can execute shell commands through execve('/bin/sh', NULL, NULL).
PEDA
PEDA is a Python extension for GDB that enhances debugging with colorized displays and specialized commands for exploit development and binary security analysis.
Side-by-Side Comparison
NIST CSF 2.0 Mapping
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Need help choosing?
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
