Cerebra mPass sso vs Okta Adaptive MFA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cerebra mPass sso

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing fragmented application access across on-premises infrastructure should evaluate Cerebra mPass sso for its passwordless authentication and real-time SIEM monitoring, which address both the access control and continuous monitoring sides of identity governance. The platform's support for air-gapped deployments and native Active Directory/LDAP integration means you're not betting on cloud connectivity or third-party identity providers. Skip this if you need cloud-first SSO, rapid SaaS onboarding, or vendor support from a larger player; Cerebra's on-premises focus and Middle East headquarters make it a harder sell in environments requiring geographic redundancy or established vendor relationships.

Okta Adaptive MFA

Mid-market and enterprise security teams replacing password-dependent SSO with phishing-resistant authentication will see the clearest ROI from Okta Adaptive MFA, especially those already on the Okta platform where FastPass and device posture checks integrate directly into existing workflows. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage of PR.AA and DE.CM means you get both strong identity controls and continuous device monitoring, which together actually prevent the account takeovers that traditional MFA leaves open. Skip this if your organization needs strict on-premises deployment or runs non-Okta identity infrastructure; you'll fight integration friction and lose the contextual policy enforcement that makes Adaptive MFA worth the switch.