NXM Autonomous Security for IoT EP vs Vali Cyber ZeroLock: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

NXM Autonomous Security for IoT EP

Mid-market and enterprise teams deploying IoT devices at scale will get the most from NXM Autonomous Security for IoT EP because it eliminates the manual device lifecycle management that bleeds security resources; the SDK-based architecture and pre-certification for UL's Security IoT Component Qualification program mean you're not reinventing compliance for every device type. The platform's strength in automated response and recovery, particularly crypto key regeneration and FOTA authorization, addresses a real gap most endpoint tools leave open. Skip this if your IoT footprint is under 500 devices or you need tight integration with your existing EDR stack rather than cloud-agnostic deployment.

Vali Cyber ZeroLock

Enterprise security teams protecting Linux infrastructure in federal or national security environments should evaluate ZeroLock for its behavioral malware detection and virtual patching capabilities, which reduce the patching lag that exposes critical systems. The tool's NIST coverage in Continuous Monitoring and Incident Analysis reflects strong detection and forensics support, though it prioritizes finding threats over orchestrating recovery workflows. Skip this if your organization runs predominantly Windows endpoints or needs a vendor with broader platform coverage; ZeroLock is purpose-built for Linux hardening in compliance-heavy sectors.