Nozzlr v1.1 vs Weakpass: 2026 Comparison
Nozzlr v1.1 is a free penetration testing tool. Weakpass is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running manual penetration tests on internal infrastructure will get the most from Nozzlr v1.1 because its Python-native design lets you embed bruteforcing logic directly into custom assessment scripts without context-switching to a separate tool. The modular architecture and threading support mean you can parallelize credential attacks across multiple targets without rewriting core logic, which the 65 GitHub stars reflect as genuinely useful to practitioners. Skip this if you need a GUI, reporting automation, or support for protocols beyond basic auth; Nozzlr is built for operators who code and expect to maintain their own tooling.
Penetration testers and red teamers running password attack campaigns will get immediate value from Weakpass; the free wordlist collections eliminate licensing friction while covering the major hash types and complexity sizes you'll actually encounter in engagements. The tool's lack of licensing overhead means you can deploy it across multiple operator machines without procurement delays. Skip this if your team needs integrated password spraying, cracking workflow automation, or multi-protocol attack orchestration; Weakpass is wordlists only, not a cracking engine or attack framework.
