Nozomi Networks Nozomi Smart Polling vs SAM rAPId: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Nozomi Networks Nozomi Smart Polling

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams managing OT/IoT environments where passive discovery leaves blind spots will get the most from Nozomi Networks Nozomi Smart Polling; active polling finds non-communicating devices and firmware patch status that network traffic alone cannot surface. The tool integrates directly with Guardian's passive baseline, meaning you're adding surgical interrogation to existing visibility rather than bolting on another silo. Skip this if your OT footprint is small enough that passive discovery already covers your critical assets, or if you lack the network segmentation to safely execute active polling without production risk.

SAM rAPId

Startups and mid-market ops teams struggling to inventory IoT and OT devices will find SAM rAPId's fingerprinting database of 500M+ devices far more useful than generic asset scanners that return incomplete or misclassified results. The API-first model means you integrate it directly into your existing workflows instead of running another scanning tool, and batch identification lets you process thousands of devices without manual effort. Skip this if your network is purely IT infrastructure with standard servers and workstations; you'll get better value from cheaper CMDB tools that don't need the fingerprinting layer SAM rAPId is built around.