Netwrix Identity Management vs One Identity Active Roles: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Netwrix Identity Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in manual access reviews will see immediate ROI from Netwrix Identity Management; its automated provisioning and least-privilege enforcement cut the grunt work that usually lands on your identity team. The platform covers NIST's PR.AA and ID.AM functions, meaning you're handling access control and asset lifecycle together rather than stitching tools end-to-end. Skip this if you need deep integration with a broader GRC platform or if your organization runs mostly on-premises infrastructure; Netwrix is cloud-first and strongest when identity governance is your primary pain point, not one piece of a larger compliance puzzle.

One Identity Active Roles

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid AD and Entra ID environments should pick One Identity Active Roles for its temporal group membership automation, which actually removes stale privileges on schedule rather than requiring manual remediation. Its support for dynamic group rules, AWS Managed AD, and fine-grained delegation across multiple domains addresses NIST PR.AA and GV.RR requirements that most identity tools treat as afterthoughts. Skip this if your organization runs Okta or pure cloud identity with no legacy AD footprint; the value proposition collapses when on-premises Active Directory isn't in the picture.