Clearly AI vs Network Intelligence Advise Framework: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Clearly AI

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in manual assessment work should use Clearly AI to replace spreadsheet-driven risk reviews with templated automation; the 30+ built-in assessment templates for security, privacy, and compliance cut the grunt work while human-in-the-loop validation catches the AI hallucinations that plague other vendors. Coverage across NIST GV (governance), ID (identify), and PR (protect) functions means it handles the upstream policy and architecture work most tools skip. This is not for organizations that need detection or response capabilities; Clearly AI stops at the assessment phase and hands off findings to your ticketing system.

Network Intelligence Advise Framework

Mid-market and enterprise security leaders rebuilding from a weak baseline will find the most value in Network Intelligence Advise Framework because it forces the foundational work that most teams skip: three-year roadmap design paired with honest maturity assessment across people, processes, and technology. The framework covers all NIST Governance functions (GV.OC through GV.OV) plus Asset Management and Risk Assessment, which means you're not bolting patches onto broken strategy. Skip this if you have mature governance already in place and need tactical detection or response tools instead; the Framework is a reset button, not an operational control.