NAN SASE vs WatchGuard FireCloud Total Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

NAN SASE: Fortinet-based managed SASE service for secure remote workforce access. built by NAN. Core capabilities include Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), DNS Protection, Data Loss Prevention (DLP)..

WatchGuard FireCloud Total Access: Cloud-based SASE solution combining FWaaS, SWG, and ZTNA for remote access. built by WatchGuard. Core capabilities include Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) for private applications, Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), Secure Web Gateway (SWG)..

Both serve the Secure Access Service Edge market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Both tools share capabilities in firewall as a service (fwaas), secure web gateway (swg). NAN SASE differentiates with DNS Protection, Data Loss Prevention (DLP), Intrusion Prevention System (IPS). WatchGuard FireCloud Total Access differentiates with Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) for private applications, Identity-based access control with device context, Per-application and per-session access controls.

NAN SASE is developed by NAN. WatchGuard FireCloud Total Access is developed by WatchGuard. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

NAN SASE and WatchGuard FireCloud Total Access serve similar Secure Access Service Edge use cases: both are Secure Access Service Edge tools, both cover SASE, Secure Web Gateway, ZTNA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.