Monkey-Spider vs MTPot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Monkey-Spider is a free honeypots & deception tool. MTPot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running client-facing web applications will get the most from Monkey-Spider because it catches malware and exploit kits that traditional server-side monitoring misses by simulating real browser behavior. The crawler-based approach means you're testing actual attack paths against your site without needing to maintain a fleet of isolated honeypot servers. Skip this if your threat model centers on internal network compromise or you need high-interaction deception that mimics production systems in full; Monkey-Spider trades realism for operational simplicity.
Security teams defending Apache Struts deployments will get the most from MTPot because it's purpose-built to trap and fingerprint Struts-specific exploits rather than acting as a generic honeypot. The 106 GitHub stars reflect active community use in production environments where Struts vulnerabilities remain a persistent attack vector. Skip this if you need broad web application honeypoting across multiple frameworks; MTPot's narrow focus means it won't catch exploitation attempts against unrelated services.
