MITM SOCKS Proxy for Java vs PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
MITM SOCKS Proxy for Java is a free penetration testing tool. PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile app security testers who need to inspect encrypted traffic from Java applications will appreciate MITM SOCKS Proxy for Java because it strips SSL/TLS interception without requiring recompilation or bytecode manipulation. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with a small but active community; it handles the specific case of SOCKS-proxied connections that commercial proxies often fumble. Skip this if your team needs a visual inspector or workflow automation; this is a command-line instrument for practitioners who understand what they're looking for in the wire.
PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)
Penetration testers who need fine-grained control over request and response manipulation will find PETEP worth the setup cost; it's Java-based, open-source, and free, which means no licensing friction for red teams running custom test scenarios. The 225 GitHub stars and active Java ecosystem reflect real adoption among practitioners who value the ability to write custom plugins rather than fight against vendor constraints. Skip it if your team expects a polished UI or needs out-of-box integrations with commercial vulnerability scanners; PETEP rewards operators comfortable building their own toolchain.
