Miniprint vs StrutsHoneypot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Miniprint is a free honeypots & deception tool. StrutsHoneypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Detection teams running flat networks or testing perimeter segmentation will get immediate value from Miniprint because it creates a convincing printer trap that actually logs PJL protocol interactions attackers rarely encounter elsewhere. The 203 GitHub stars and zero-friction deployment as a virtual filesystem make it fast to spin up for red team exercises or internal network monitoring. Skip this if you need honeypots covering multiple services or attackers sophisticated enough to verify printer authenticity; Miniprint excels at catching reconnaissance and lateral movement but won't fool adversaries doing deep device fingerprinting.
Teams running legacy Java applications still exposed to Struts CVE-2017-5638 should deploy StrutsHoneypot as a low-friction detection layer; it's free, requires minimal setup on Apache 2 infrastructure, and gives you concrete proof of exploitation attempts before they hit your application layer. The 72 GitHub stars and active exploitation history of this CVE make it worth the single-purpose overhead. Skip this if you need a multi-CVE honeypot or are already running intrusion detection that catches OGNL injection patterns; StrutsHoneypot wins only if you have unpatched Struts instances you can't immediately retire.
