Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Microsoft Entra ID is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Microsoft. Secfense UASB is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Secfense. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Enterprise and mid-market teams already committed to Microsoft 365 should choose Microsoft Entra ID because it eliminates the identity tax of managing a separate platform, with conditional access policies that actually enforce what your Microsoft-native apps require. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage on PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control) is solid, and the integration with Security Copilot means threat investigation workflows stay within your existing Microsoft ecosystem rather than forcing context-switching. Skip this if you need deep API governance or fine-grained entitlements for non-Microsoft SaaS applications; Entra ID treats those as secondary use cases, and you'll end up stitching in third-party tools anyway.
Security teams managing legacy web applications without development resources will get the most from Secfense UASB because it bolts MFA onto any app in minutes without touching code. The reverse proxy deployment learns application traffic patterns automatically and enforces organization-wide authentication policy, meaning you skip the six-month developer queue that kills most MFA rollouts. Skip this if your infrastructure is API-first or you need deep integrations with your identity provider; Secfense works best as a perimeter layer for traditional web apps that haven't been touched in years.
Cloud-based identity and access management solution for enterprises
Reverse proxy broker adding MFA/FIDO to any web app without code changes.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Microsoft Entra ID vs Secfense UASB for your multi-factor authentication and single sign-on needs.
Microsoft Entra ID: Cloud-based identity and access management solution for enterprises. built by Microsoft. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication (MFA), Single sign-on (SSO), Passwordless authentication..
Secfense UASB: Reverse proxy broker adding MFA/FIDO to any web app without code changes. built by Secfense. Core capabilities include Add MFA to any web application without source code modification, FIDO/passkey-based strong authentication support, Reverse proxy deployment that learns application traffic patterns..
Both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Microsoft Entra ID differentiates with Multi-factor authentication (MFA), Single sign-on (SSO), Passwordless authentication. Secfense UASB differentiates with Add MFA to any web application without source code modification, FIDO/passkey-based strong authentication support, Reverse proxy deployment that learns application traffic patterns.
Microsoft Entra ID is developed by Microsoft. Secfense UASB is developed by Secfense. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Microsoft Entra ID and Secfense UASB serve similar Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On use cases: both are Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On tools, both cover MFA, Authentication. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox