MFT_Browser vs NTFS-Linker: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
MFT_Browser is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. NTFS-Linker is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Forensic analysts and incident responders who need to rapidly reconstruct Windows filesystem timelines will find MFT_Browser invaluable; it's the only free tool that maps the Master File Table with the granularity required to catch evidence deletion and file manipulation across NTFS partitions. With 325 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's proven reliable in actual investigations where commercial alternatives cost thousands per license. Skip this if you're looking for automated correlation across multiple artifact types,MFT_Browser does one thing exceptionally well and ignores everything else.
Incident responders and forensic investigators who need surgical precision on Windows timeline reconstruction should reach for NTFS-Linker; it does one thing,parsing $Logfile and $MFT artifacts,better than bloated all-in-one suites because it's built specifically for that narrow job. The tool is free and widely deployed in law enforcement and corporate IR teams because it recovers filesystem timelines that GUI-based forensic platforms often miss or misinterpret. Skip this if your team lacks filesystem-level forensic expertise or needs a point-and-click interface; NTFS-Linker requires command-line comfort and knowledge of NTFS journal semantics to avoid false conclusions.
