MFT Parsers Review vs MFT_Browser: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
MFT Parsers Review is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. MFT_Browser is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Forensic analysts and incident responders who need to validate or compare NTFS timeline reconstruction methods should use MFT Parsers Review to audit parser accuracy before committing to a single tool in production. The review evaluates how different parsers handle edge cases in Master File Table extraction, inconsistencies that directly impact whether you catch timeline gaps during investigations. Skip this if your team has already standardized on a parser and has no budget for validation work; the review is reference material, not a parser itself.
Forensic analysts and incident responders who need to rapidly reconstruct Windows filesystem timelines will find MFT_Browser invaluable; it's the only free tool that maps the Master File Table with the granularity required to catch evidence deletion and file manipulation across NTFS partitions. With 325 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's proven reliable in actual investigations where commercial alternatives cost thousands per license. Skip this if you're looking for automated correlation across multiple artifact types,MFT_Browser does one thing exceptionally well and ignores everything else.
