Metasploitable3 vs Cyberbit Platform: 2026 Comparison
Metasploitable3 is a free cyber range training tool. Cyberbit Platform is a commercial cyber range training tool by Cyberbit. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal cyber ranges or red team labs should choose Metasploitable3 for its deliberately vulnerable attack surface and tight integration with Metasploit Framework, eliminating the setup friction of hunting for compatible targets. The 5,470 GitHub stars reflect sustained adoption by practitioners, and the free price point means you can spin up isolated instances for each training cohort without budget negotiation. Skip this if you need a modern Windows environment or current OS versions; Metasploitable3's older stack is the feature, not the bug, but it won't teach your team anything about patching contemporary vulnerabilities.
Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams that need hands-on incident response training without spinning up fake networks should run drills on Cyberbit Platform. The platform delivers realistic attack simulations that directly train analysts on detection and investigation workflows, addressing the PR.AT and DE.AE gaps most teams have after hiring. Skip this if your priority is risk assessment or vulnerability management; Cyberbit is narrowly built for SOC floor competency, not enterprise-wide risk visibility.
