Greenbone OPENVAS SCAN vs MetaHub: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Greenbone OPENVAS SCAN is a commercial vulnerability assessment tool by Greenbone AG. MetaHub is a free vulnerability assessment tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best vulnerability assessment fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
SMB and mid-market security teams with limited budgets and segmented networks will get the most from Greenbone OPENVAS SCAN because the hardware and virtual appliance options let you deploy scanning where your infrastructure actually lives, not where a cloud vendor prefers. The master sensor architecture and airgap technology mean you can run continuous vulnerability assessment in isolated environments without fighting API integrations or cloud connectivity, and daily feed updates keep detection current without vendor lock-in. Skip this if you need a single platform handling risk quantification, threat intelligence correlation, or remediation orchestration across multiple tools; OPENVAS SCAN is a scanner that does scanning well, not a risk aggregator.
AWS security teams drowning in vulnerability noise will find MetaHub's real value in its contextualization layer: it automatically maps findings to actual AWS resources, ownership, and blast radius instead of dumping raw CVE lists. With 176 GitHub stars and open-source transparency, you're not locked into vendor scoring logic; you can audit and modify the prioritization rules yourself. Skip this if you need multi-cloud coverage or are still building your AWS infrastructure-as-code practices; MetaHub assumes you have workload inventory and ownership data worth contextualizing.
