CloudJack vs MetaHub: 2026 Comparison
CloudJack is a free vulnerability assessment tool. MetaHub is a free vulnerability assessment tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best vulnerability assessment fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
AWS security teams managing Route53 or CloudFront infrastructure should run CloudJack to catch subdomain hijacking before attackers do; it's free and finds a narrow but high-impact vulnerability class that most general scanners miss entirely. The tool has 86 GitHub stars and no pricing barrier, making it a quick addition to any AWS assessment workflow. Skip this if you need vulnerability scanning beyond DNS/CDN configuration or if your threat model doesn't include subdomain takeover as a material risk.
AWS security teams drowning in vulnerability noise will find MetaHub's real value in its contextualization layer: it automatically maps findings to actual AWS resources, ownership, and blast radius instead of dumping raw CVE lists. With 176 GitHub stars and open-source transparency, you're not locked into vendor scoring logic; you can audit and modify the prioritization rules yourself. Skip this if you need multi-cloud coverage or are still building your AWS infrastructure-as-code practices; MetaHub assumes you have workload inventory and ownership data worth contextualizing.
Data verified Apr 2026
