metahttp vs xxexploiter: 2026 Comparison
metahttp is a free penetration testing tool. xxexploiter is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers doing XXE discovery in scope-constrained engagements will find metahttp useful for its laser focus: it's a lightweight bash script that hunts HTTP resources through XML external entity injection without the overhead of full-stack scanners. The 38 GitHub stars and free pricing reflect honest adoption limits; this is a specialized tool, not a platform. Skip it if you need post-exploitation capabilities or are scanning environments where you can't inject XXE payloads; metahttp does one job and doesn't pretend otherwise.
Penetration testers validating XXE patch coverage across legacy applications will find xxexploiter invaluable for its speed; you craft the payload once and iterate across dozens of endpoints without rebuilding exploitation logic each time. The free price point and 565 GitHub stars indicate it's proven in real assessments, not theoretical. Skip this if your scope includes modern APIs or frameworks that reject malformed XML outright; xxexploiter assumes you're already past basic input validation and targeting systems with actual parsers.
