metahttp vs oxml_xxe: 2026 Comparison
metahttp is a free penetration testing tool. oxml_xxe is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers doing XXE discovery in scope-constrained engagements will find metahttp useful for its laser focus: it's a lightweight bash script that hunts HTTP resources through XML external entity injection without the overhead of full-stack scanners. The 38 GitHub stars and free pricing reflect honest adoption limits; this is a specialized tool, not a platform. Skip it if you need post-exploitation capabilities or are scanning environments where you can't inject XXE payloads; metahttp does one job and doesn't pretend otherwise.
Penetration testers running document-focused engagements will get immediate value from oxml_xxe because it automates XXE payload injection into Office files, PDFs, and archives,the files most organizations actually encounter in the wild. The tool's 1,106 GitHub stars reflect real adoption among red teams, and it cuts hours off manual payload crafting when testing client infrastructure. Skip this if your scope is API-heavy or you need post-exploitation capabilities; oxml_xxe is purely injection, not payload delivery or exfiltration.
