Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) vs Sonoma Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX): Gateway for securing, governing, and auditing AI agent access to MCP servers. built by Lunar.dev. Core capabilities include Centralized MCP server registry with service discovery for local and remote servers, Role-based access control (RBAC) with per-agent tool restrictions and on-behalf-of attribution, Authentication to MCP servers via API keys or OAuth..

Sonoma Security: MCP governance platform for securing and controlling enterprise AI agents. built by Sonoma Security. Core capabilities include Self-service MCP catalog, Visual MCP workflow builder, One-click workflow deployment..

Both serve the Agentic AI Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) differentiates with Centralized MCP server registry with service discovery for local and remote servers, Role-based access control (RBAC) with per-agent tool restrictions and on-behalf-of attribution, Authentication to MCP servers via API keys or OAuth. Sonoma Security differentiates with Self-service MCP catalog, Visual MCP workflow builder, One-click workflow deployment.

Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) is developed by Lunar.dev. Sonoma Security is developed by Sonoma Security. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) and Sonoma Security serve similar Agentic AI Security use cases: both are Agentic AI Security tools, both cover MCP Security, Agentic AI Security, AI Governance. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.